• Is The Issue Of Health Care Pushing Your Buttons?

  • Share Your Story

    If you have a story to share about healthcare issues in South Carolina, we want to hear it!

Exactly Which Life-Saving Provision Would You Repeal, Mr. Candidate?

As they stump across South Carolina, top-tier GOP candidates are fond of boasting how quickly they, as president, would do away with the Affordable Care Act. Never mind that the law’s most important provisions are hugely popular with the majority of Americans.

In response, Boston Globe columnist John McDonough penned a nuts-and-bolts piece, in which he urges voters and the press to ask GOP candidates whether they would repeal specifically those popular provisions. In fact, he prepared a list of 50 questions for everybody to put to anti-ACA politicians. A sampling:

If you are elected President, are you committed to repealing the section of the Affordable Care Act (section # in parenthesis) that:

1. Prohibits health insurance companies from imposing lifetime or annual benefit caps on health insurance policies and consumers? (1001)

2. Prohibits health insurance companies from rescinding an individual’s insurance coverage because of an error or misstatement on a coverage application not connected to fraud? (1001)

3. Requires health insurances to cover proven clinical preventive services without co-pays or deductibles? (1001)

4. Permits parents to keep their adult children up to age 26 on their health insurance policies? (1001)

5. Requires health insurers to provide enrollees with a clear summary of benefits and coverage not to exceed four pages? (1001)

6. Requires health insurers to spend no more than 15 or 20 cents of every premium dollar on profit, marketing, administrative costs as opposed to medical expenses? (1001)

7. Sets national standards for administrative simplification to reduce the paperwork burden on patients, providers and insurers? (1104)

8. Prohibits health insurers from refusing to cover individuals based on pre-existing medical conditions? (1201)

9. Requires the establishment of health insurance exchanges in each state to provide an easy, online way for consumers to compare and buy health insurance? (1311)

10. Provides tax credits to income eligible individuals to be able to afford to purchase health insurance? (1401)

Those are the first 10. McDonough has 40 more.

And he’s right. We’re letting the anti-reform crowd get away with calling the whole law bad, while most Americans agree that most of its content is good. Let’s start hammering the Obamacare detractors on what exactly they would like to repeal and see if they really support shutting the terminally ill and others out of our healthcare system.

Moment of Schadenfreude: Anti-ACA Candidate Bites Dust

Over at National Journal, Sophie Quinton rightly notes that one of the GOP’s fiercest crusaders against Obamacare has fallen by the electoral wayside. In fact, that candidate’s entire campaign was founded on dismantling healthcare reform.

Oh, well, Michelle. The people have spoken.

Igor Volsky at Think Progress also jumped on this point a little later, concluding that:

…with the mother of health care repeal now out of the race, yesterday’s results showed that opponents of Obamacare don’t have rule of the roost, despite the GOP’s incessant attacks against Obama’s signature reform legislation. In fact, most Americans still support large portions of the law. The latest Kaiser tracking poll finds that while 44 percent of voters have an unfavorable view of reform, 50 percent want to expand or keep it in place, with only 37 percent supporting repeal. A majority favor its most popular elements like easy-to-understand benefit summaries and tax credits for small businesses.

Then there’s this:

SCOTUS Sets Date For Obamacare Showdown

From Politico:

The Supreme Court will hear three days of oral arguments. | NIKO DUFFY/POLITICO

By JENNIFER HABERKORN

The health care showdown of 2012 has been scheduled.

The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear three days of oral arguments on various pieces of the health reform law on March 26, 27 and 28 — just days after the law’s two-year anniversary.

On Monday, March 26, the justices will hear one hour of debate on whether the Anti-Injunction Act prevents the court from ruling on the constitutionality of the law.

On Tuesday, March 27, the justices will hear two hours of argument on the constitutionality of the mandate, the centerpiece issue of the case.

On Wednesday, March 28, 90 minutes of argument will be held on which pieces of the law should fall if the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, and an hour of argument will be held on whether the law’s Medicaid expansion is constitutional.

In November, the court indicated it would spread the arguments on the health law’s four issues over just two days. The suit was brought by 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Business.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers